Trina is the kind of person who doesn’t like wasting time. She’s new, but she’s serious. She wants to be the kind of teammate you can rely on without needing to be reminded.
Her manager, Carlo, is also serious. He’s the kind of leader who carries ten tabs open in his head—client concerns, deadlines, and a meeting that got moved to tomorrow morning. He’s not careless. He’s just moving fast.
Late afternoon, Carlo messages Trina: “Can you prepare something for tomorrow’s meeting?”
Trina replies, “Sure.” She wants to look dependable. She also doesn’t want to interrupt a busy leader with too many questions.
That night, she stays late. She searches templates, fixes formatting, and adds “extra” slides—just in case.
The next morning, Carlo scans her work and says, “This is good. I just needed a one-paragraph email I can forward.”
In that moment, nobody is stupid.
It’s just one of those work moments where clarity stayed in someone’s head, and effort tried to fill the gap.
Have you been Trina? Or do you know someone who worked hard… then realized they worked on the wrong thing?
When effort becomes your safety blanket
When you’re new, effort feels like the safest currency you have. You may not have influence yet. You may not know the hidden rules of the organization. You may still be earning trust. But you can control one thing: how hard you work.
So you work hard in silence.
I used to think this was professionalism—keep your head down, deliver something impressive, and don’t bother people with questions. Over time, I noticed a painful pattern: when instructions are vague, effort doesn’t solve the problem. Effort just makes unclear work look prettier.
That’s how people become “busy” without becoming useful.
The quiet critical thinking move
Hard work is energy.
Clarity is direction.
Energy without direction doesn’t create value. It creates rework, revisions, and that subtle frustration that shows up as, “Ah… this isn’t what I meant.”
Critical thinking at work often looks like this: you reduce ambiguity before you execute. You don’t argue. You don’t overanalyze. You simply refuse to build on assumptions.
This is what I’m practicing more intentionally now, because I’ve paid for unclear targets many times. I’ve done the “I’ll figure it out” approach, only to realize later that I figured out the wrong thing—beautifully.
How vague instructions happen (even with good leaders)
It’s easy to assume vague instructions mean poor leadership. Sometimes that’s true, but often it’s just speed. Leaders think in outcomes. They see the meeting in their head. They know what the director or client expects. They forget that you don’t have the same context yet.
So they say “prepare something,” but what they mean is specific: a one-paragraph email, a one-page summary, three key points, one recommendation, delivered in a format someone else can use quickly.
Nobody is wrong. The gap is just unspoken.
And new professionals pay for unspoken gaps with long nights.
The difference between working hard and working right
A manager says, “Draft a report.”
The new professional hears: full report, complete background, all details, polished layout.
The manager means: short summary, key points only, something I can use to decide.
Both people are trying to do good work. They’re just solving different problems.
Once you see this, you realize the goal isn’t to become “more hardworking.” The goal is to become clearer before you commit effort.
What I’m practicing now: clarity first, effort second
Here’s a small rule I’m trying to live by, especially when I’m tempted to prove myself through effort:
Clarity first. Effort second.
This isn’t about asking a lot of questions. It’s about asking one good question early enough to prevent two days of rework later.
It still feels awkward sometimes, especially when people are rushing and you feel like you’re supposed to just follow. But I’d rather feel awkward for ten seconds than redo work for two days.
“But I don’t want to sound annoying.”
I get it.
In many workplaces, new professionals are trained—quietly—to just execute. You don’t want to be the person who asks what everyone else “already knows.” You don’t want to look like you need hand-holding.
But here’s what I’ve learned: clarity questions aren’t demands. They’re contributions.
When you ask for clarity, you protect the outcome. You protect your manager’s time. You protect the team’s schedule. You protect yourself from surprises.
And most leaders don’t get annoyed at questions that reduce risk. They get annoyed at last-minute surprises that could’ve been prevented.
Critical Thinking Skill: Reduce ambiguity before execution
This is the skill behind the article.
Critical thinking isn’t about sounding smart. It’s about making sure the work makes sense before you throw hours at it. It’s the discipline of confirming the target—so your effort actually lands.
The tool I share: the Output Confirmation Message
When someone tells me, “Sir Jef, paano ba magtanong nang hindi awkward?” this is the script I share. I use it too, especially when instructions feel vague.
Memory cue: Format. Standard. Purpose.
Option 1: Confirm the format
“Quick check—what format do you want for this? (Email / one-pager / slides)”
Option 2: Confirm what “good” means
“Before I start, what would make this ‘good’ for you?”
Option 3: Confirm the purpose
“Who is this for, and what do you want them to do after they read it?”
If Taglish feels more natural, these lines usually land well:
“Quick check—ano yung expected output?”
“Para aligned—ano yung itsura ng ‘good’?”
“Sino gagamit nito, and ano yung next decision nila?”
That last one is my favorite because it turns work into decision support. It also helps your manager get clearer, without making them feel wrong.
A quick micro-story (the second try)
A supervisor once told a new analyst, “Prepare something about the issue.” The analyst didn’t ask, created a 12-slide deck with charts and background, and delivered it proudly.
The supervisor looked at it and said, “I don’t need slides. I need one paragraph I can send to head office in 30 minutes.”
The analyst felt embarrassed, but the real problem wasn’t competence. The real problem was the missing question at the start.
Next week, the supervisor assigned another task. The analyst tried something new. “Ma’am, one paragraph again? And do you want options or one recommendation?”
The supervisor smiled. “Options, then your recommended choice.”
Same analyst. Different result.
Not because she became smarter overnight, but because she started thinking before she started producing.
The small experiment I’m running this week
I’m testing a simple habit: every time I receive a task that sounds vague—words like “something,” “prepare,” “report,” “draft,” “update”—I pause and send one confirmation message before I begin.
It can feel like an extra step in the moment. But most of the time, it removes five future steps: rework, revisions, explanations, and that painful “Ah, I meant…” conversation.
If you want to explore the shift with me, borrow the script once this week and see what happens.
Because in real work, effort is respected.
But clarity is trusted.
Clarity first. Effort second.
If your team is stuck in meetings, misalignment, or slow decisions…
Let’s design one shift they can use immediately.
→ Shift Experiences






